PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Border Jobs for Veterans Act of 2015

Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.

Official summary

Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Sep 9, 2015

Border Jobs for Veterans Act of 2015

(Sec. 3) Directs the Department of Homeland Security (DHS): (1) in conjunction with the Department of Defense (DOD), to identify Military Occupational Specialty Codes and Officer Branches, Air Force Specialty Codes, Naval Enlisted Classifications and Officer Designators, and Coast Guard Competencies (qualifications) that are transferable to the requirements and duties assigned to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Officers; and (2) to consider hiring qualified candidates with such qualifications who are eligible for veterans recruitment appointment.

(Sec. 4) Directs DHS, in conjunction with DOD, acting through existing programs, authorities, and agreements, to enhance DHS efforts to recruit members of the Armed Forces who are separating from military service to serve as CBP Officers. Requires such enhanced efforts to:

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

include CBP Officer opportunities in relevant job assistance efforts under the Transition Assistance Program;

place CBP officials or other relevant DHS officials at recruiting events and jobs fairs involving separating members of the Armed Forces;

provide opportunities for local CBP field offices to partner with military bases in the region;

include outreach efforts to educate members of the Armed Forces with qualifications that are transferable to CBP Officer requirements;

require DOD and DHS to work cooperatively to identify shared activities and opportunities for reciprocity related to steps in hiring CBP officers with the goal of minimizing the time required to hire qualified applicants;

require DOD and DHS to work cooperatively to ensure the streamlined interagency transfer of relevant background investigations and security clearances; and

include other elements to ensure that separating members of the Armed Forces are aware of opportunities to fill vacant CBP Officer positions.

(Sec. 5) Directs DHS and DOD, within 180 days after enactment of this Act and by December 31 of each of the three successive years, to jointly submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees on DHS efforts to hire separating service members as CBP Officers.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Flake, Jeff [R-AZ] · R–AZ

Committees

  • Homeland Security Committee
  • Armed Services Committee
  • Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
13 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.

  2. Passed House with amendment pursuant to H. Res. 421.

  3. Passed/agreed to in House: Passed House with amendment pursuant to H. Res. 421.

  4. Referred to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security.

  5. Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  6. Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Received in the House.

  9. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  10. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  11. The committee reported substitute amendment was withdrawn by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6539)

  12. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S6539-6040; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S6539)

  13. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 196.

  14. Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Johnson with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 114-116.

  15. Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Johnson with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 114-116.

  16. Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  17. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

  18. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Mar 4, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1603 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1603 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1603 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1603 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources