PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent.
Congressional Research Service
Version 34 · Indefinitely postponed in Senate · May 12, 1994
Independent Safety Board Act Amendments of 1994 - Amends the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 to authorize appropriations for FY 1994 through 1996 for the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). (Sec. 3) Amends the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 with respect to the applicability of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety requirements to public aircraft (aircraft used exclusively in the service of any Federal, State, or local government, excluding government-owned aircraft engaged in carrying persons or property for commercial purposes). Revises the definition of "engaged in carrying persons" to include the provision of passenger transportation but not: (1) the carriage of crewmembers or of other required persons aboard such aircraft for a governmental function such as fire fighting, search and rescue, law enforcement, aeronautical research, or biological or geological resource management; or (2) the carriage of persons (other than for commercial purposes) aboard aircraft operated by the armed forces or a U.S. intelligence agency. Authorizes the Administrator of the FAA (Administrator) to exempt such aircraft from FAA safety requirements if it is in the public interest. Amends the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 to grant the NTSB authority to investigate nonmilitary public aircraft accidents. (Sec. 4) Requires the Administrator to consider for approval the new generation, low cost, advanced landing system being developed by the Department of Defense.
People & committees
Sen. Ford, Wendell H. [D-KY] · D–KY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent.
Senate passed companion measure H.R. 2440 in lieu of this measure by Voice Vote.
Senate incorporated this measure in H.R. 2440 as an amendment.
Measure laid before Senate. (consideration: CR S5707-5710)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 294.
Committee on Commerce. Reported to Senate by Senator Hollings without amendment. With written report No. 103-185.
Committee on Commerce. Reported to Senate by Senator Hollings without amendment. With written report No. 103-185.
Committee on Commerce. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Subcommittee on Aviation. Hearings held.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S14435)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1588 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1588 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1588 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1588 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.