PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to Subcommittee on Parks, Preservation and Recreation.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 29, 1996
Lower Eastern Shore American Heritage Area Act of 1996 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior to establish a Lower Eastern Shore American Heritage Area in the Maryland counties of Somerset, Wicomico, and Worcester. Requires the Secretary to enter into a compact (which shall include information relating to the objectives and management of the Area's programs) with the State of Maryland, the Lower Eastern Shore Heritage Committee, Inc. (coordinating entity) and any county eligible to be a participating partner under this Act. Requires the coordinating entity and the participating partners to develop a management plan for the Area that presents comprehensive recommendations for conservation, program funding, management, and development. Provides that, if the Secretary has not approved a plan by two years after this Act's enactment date, the Area shall be ineligible for Federal funding until a management plan is approved. Sets forth provisions concerning: (1) the duties of the coordinating entity and participating partners; (2) limitations on Federal contributions for the operation and implementation costs of such entities and partners with respect to this Act; (3) a prohibition on use of such funds for acquisition of real property; and (4) eligibility of coordinating entities to receive the funds for a ten- year period after the date on which the compact is signed and, if necessary, for an additional five-year period, under specified conditions. Directs the Secretary to make grants available to the coordinating entity and participating partners. Authorizes the Secretary to provide technical and financial assistance to coordinating entities and participating partners, on the request of coordinating entities. Allows the Secretary to expend Federal funds for nonfederally- owned property to further the purpose of this Act. Requires a Federal entity conducting or supporting an activity directly affecting the Area and any unit of government acting pursuant to a grant of Federal funds or a Federal permit or agreement conducting or supporting such activity to: (1) consult with the Secretary and the coordinating entity with respect to the activity; (2) cooperate with the Secretary and the entity in carrying out the Secretary's and the entity's duties under this Act; and (3) conduct or support the activity in a manner consistent with the management plan. Authorizes appropriations.
People & committees
Sen. Sarbanes, Paul S. [D-MD] · D–MD
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to Subcommittee on Parks, Preservation and Recreation.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S1458-1461)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1583 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1583 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1583 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1583 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.