PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Held at the desk.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Oct 18, 1993
Provides that the Federal participation agreement for the Centennial Bridge, Rock Island, Illinois, shall be treated as if such agreement had been entered into before the effective date of title I of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 and may be modified accordingly.
People & committees
Sen. Simon, Paul [D-IL] · D–IL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Held at the desk.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR 9/22/94 S13316)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR 9/22/94 S13316)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 613.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Baucus without amendment. With written report No. 103-369.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Baucus without amendment. With written report No. 103-369.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1555 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1555 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1555 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1555 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.