PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Reprocessed Single Use Medical Device Patient Safety Amendments of 1999

Read twice and referred to the Committee on HELP.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Aug 5, 1999

Reprocessed Single Use Medical Device Patient Safety Amendments of 1999 - Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require every person or establishment (entity) engaged in the reprocessing of a medical device labeled for single use shall: (1) upon first engaging in such reprocessing and for each year in which such entity continues to so engage, register with the Secretary of Health and Human Services and provide all required information; and (2) for each such year, submit to the Secretary a list of devices labeled for single use that the entity is reprocessing, including names of original manufacturers and specific models. Requires each such entity to: (1) provide such information to each person or establishment that uses such device; and (2) demonstrate the device's safety and effectiveness.Requires every person or establishment that uses a class II or III reprocessed medical device for the provision of medical care to individuals to seek informed patient consent for such use, and to include a record of such use in the individual's medical record.Requires a report from the Secretary to specified congressional committees on the safety and efficacy of the reprocessing of devices labeled for single use.Requires the Secretary to modify the MEDWATCH forms to facilitate the reporting of such information.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL] · D–IL

Committees

  • Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on HELP.

    2. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.1542 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.1542 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.1542 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.1542 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources