PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 550.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Oct 7, 1993
Indian Fish and Wildlife Resources Management Act of 1993 - Title I: General Provisions - Sets forth findings, purposes, and definitions. Title II: Indian Fish and Wildlife Programs - Directs the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) to establish the Indian Fish and Wildlife Resource Management Program. Authorizes the Secretary to provide financial and technical assistance to enable tribes to: (1) review and update tribal fish and wildlife codes; and (2) train and employ tribal personnel. Authorizes the Secretary to grant fish and wildlife management scholarships. Directs the Secretary to establish a Fish and Wildlife Resources Intern Program and related outreach, postgraduate, and recruitment programs. Directs the Secretary to establish an Indian Fish Hatchery Assistance Program. Title III: Indian Bison Conservation and Management - Authorizes the Secretary to establish an Indian Bison Conservation Program. Directs the Secretary to establish Indian Bison Demonstration Projects. Title IV: Native Hawaiian Community-Based Fisheries Demonstration Projects - Directs the Secretary to make a grant to the Western Pacific Fishery Management Council for Native Hawaiian community-based fisheries demonstration projects. Title V: Authorization of Appropriations - Authorizes appropriations. Title VI: Miscellaneous Provisions - Sets forth provisions regarding regulations, severability, trust responsibility, and treaty obligations.
People & committees
Sen. Inouye, Daniel K. [D-HI] · D–HI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 550.
Committee on Indian Affairs. Reported to Senate by Senator Inouye with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 103-329.
Committee on Indian Affairs. Reported to Senate by Senator Inouye with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 103-329.
Committee on Indian Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 103-82.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S13268)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jun 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1526 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1526 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1526 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1526 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.