PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Congressional Research Service
Version 49 · Public Law · Dec 30, 2019
Pallone-Thune Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence Act or the Pallone-Thune TRACED Act
This bill establishes rules and requirements to deter criminal robocall violations.
Specifically, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) must
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
require voice service providers to develop call authentication technologies;
initiate a rulemaking to protect a subscriber from receiving unwanted calls or texts from a caller using an unauthenticated number;
establish when a provider may block a voice call based on information provided by the call authentication framework, but also establish a process to permit a calling party adversely affected by the framework to verify the authenticity of their calls;
streamline the ways in which a private entity may voluntarily share information with the FCC relating to a call or text message that violates robocall restrictions;
determine whether its policies regarding access to number resources could be modified to help reduce access to numbers by potential robocall violators;
report on the implementation of the reassigned number database;
implement consumer protections for exempted classes of robocalls;
ensure opt-out/opt-in robocall blocking services provide transparency and redress options for consumers and callers with no additional line item charge to consumers or additional charge to callers for resolving complaints related to erroneously blocked calls;
study whether to require a provider of a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service to give the FCC its contact information and retain a record of each call transmitted over the VoIP service that is sufficient to trace a call back to its source;
provide the Department of Justice with any evidence obtained suggesting a robocall violation made with an intent to defraud or cause harm;
protect called parties from one-ring scams (where a caller allows the call to ring for a short duration to prompt the called party to return the call and incur charges);
establish a registration process for a single consortium that conducts private-led efforts to trace back the origin of suspected unlawful robocalls; and
establish the Hospital Robocall Protection Group to issue best practices for combating unlawful robocalls made to hospitals, helping hospitals protect themselves, and assisting federal and state governments to combat such calls.
The bill also implements a forfeiture penalty for violations (with or without intent) of the prohibitions on certain robocalls.
People & committees
Sen. Thune, John [R-SD] · R–SD
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 116-105.
Became Public Law No: 116-105.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate agreed to the House amendment to S. 151 by Voice Vote.
Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to the House amendment to S. 151 by Voice Vote.
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S7177)
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 417 - 3 (Roll no. 647). (text: CR H9235-9239)
House roll call 647 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 417 - 3 (Roll no. 647).(text: CR H9235-9239)
House roll call 647 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H9246-9247)
At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 151.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9235-9245)
Mr. Pallone moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 97 - 1. Record Vote Number: 127.
Senate roll call 127 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 97 - 1. Record Vote Number: 127.
Senate roll call 127 · Individual votesThe committee substitute agreed to by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S3075-3076)
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S3075-3077)
An errata sheet on written report No. 116-41 was printed.
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 94.
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Wicker with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 116-41.
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Wicker with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 116-41.
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.151 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.151 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.151 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.151 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.