PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendments to Senate bill and House requests a conference.
Congressional Research Service
Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Jul 30, 1999
Amends Federal aviation law to extend, for a 60 day period ending October 5, 1999, the authorization of appropriations for: (1) the Airport Improvement Program; (2) Federal aviation insurance and reinsurance programs; (3) the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Facilities and Equipment Program; and (4) FAA operations. Earmarks amounts from the Grants-in-Aid for Airports program for obligation in the third and fourth quarters of FY 1999.
People & committees
Sen. McCain, John [R-AZ] · R–AZ
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendments to Senate bill and House requests a conference.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
The Speaker appointed conferees - from the Committee on Ways and Means for consideration of title XI of the House amendment, and modifications committed to conference: Nussle, Hulshof, and Rangel.
The Speaker appointed conferees - from the Committee on the Budget for consideration of titles IX and X of the House amendment, and modifications committed to conference: Chambliss, Shays, and Spratt.
The Speaker appointed conferees - from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure for consideration of the Senate bill and the House amendment, and modifications committed to conference: Shuster, Young (AK), Petri, Duncan, Ewing, Horn, Quinn, Ehlers, Bass, Pease, Sweeney, Oberstar, Rahall, Lipinski, DeFazio, Costello, Danner, Johnson, E. B., Millender-McDonald, and Boswell.
On motion that the House insist upon its amendments, and request a conference Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H7459-7460)
Mr. Shuster asked unanimous consent that the House insist upon its amendments, and request a conference.
The title of the measure was amended to that of similar measure H.R. 1000. Agreed to without objection.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed without objection.
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.
The House struck all after the enacting clause and inserted in lieu thereof the provisions of a similar measure H.R. 1000. Agreed to without objection.
RESERVATION OF OBJECTION - Mr. Obey reserved the right to object in order to debate the motion under his reservation.
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H7434-7460)
Mr. Shuster asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table and consider.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 276 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S. 1467. makes in order a motion to strike al after the enacting clause of the Senate bill and to insert the text of H.R. 1000 as passed by the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Held at the desk.
Received in the House.
Introduced in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9954)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Introduced in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9954)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1467 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1467 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1467 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1467 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.