Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Aug 6, 1993
Habeas Corpus Reform Act of 1993 - Amends the Federal judicial code to revise provisions governing habeas corpus procedures, particularly in capital cases. Establishes a statute of limitations of one year for the filing of an application for habeas corpus relief from a sentence of death. Prescribes: (1) periods during which such time requirement shall be tolled, including any period in which the State has failed to appoint counsel for State post-conviction review; and (2) conditions under which such requirement shall be tolled. Specifies requirements for stays of execution in capital cases. Bars the court from announcing or applying a new rule that changes the constitutional or statutory standards that prevailed at the time the petitioner's conviction and sentence became final on direct appeal to grant habeas corpus relief, except when such rule: (1) places a class of individual conduct beyond the power of the criminal lawmaking authority to proscribe or prohibits the imposition of a certain type of punishment for a class of persons because of their status or offense; or (2) constitutes a watershed rule of criminal procedure implicating the fundamental fairness and accuracy of the criminal proceeding. Requires that claims presented in a habeas corpus petition not timely presented in a prior petition be dismissed unless the petitioner makes a specified showing and the facts underlying the claim, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to undermine the court's confidence in the factfinder's determination of the applicant's guilt or demonstrate that no reasonable sentencing authority would have found a condition of eligibility for a sentence or would have imposed a death sentence. Sets forth provisions regarding: (1) new evidence in capital cases; (2) certificates of probable cause; and (3) assistance of counsel (requiring that every indigent capital defendant at all stages from trial through the end of the State proceedings be provided with counsel meeting specified standards of knowledge and experience in capital cases). Amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to require the Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance to make grants to States: (1) to support litigation pertaining to Federal habeas corpus petitions in capital cases; and (2) for State capital litigation. Authorizes appropriations. Requires States in which a death sentence may be imposed to certify compliance with counsel-related provisions or have State allocations reduced.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.1441 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.1441 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.1441 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.1441 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.