PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S10068)
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jul 26, 1999
Farm Income and Trade Equity Act of 1999 - Amends the Agricultural Market Transition Act to authorize agricultural owners or producers subject to production flexibility contracts to permanently elect to receive payments and marketing assistance loans which factor in European Union (EU) support levels in lieu of contract payments and marketing assistance loans under such Act. Sets forth payment rate and related provisions for: (1) wheat, feed grains, and oilseeds; and (2) cotton and rice. Sets forth alternative loan rate provisions for electing owners or producers. Amends the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to provide for increased funding (including situations affected by Uruguay Round Trade Agreement caps) for the export enhancement program and the dairy export incentive program (under the Food Security Act of 1985) equal to direct EU subsidies.
People & committees
Sen. Conrad, Kent [D-ND] · D–ND
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S10068)
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S9230-9233)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1436 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1436 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1436 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1436 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.