PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.See H.R.1358.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 28, 1995
Amends the Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 1994 and the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 1992 to extend certain deadlines under such Acts.
People & committees
Sen. McCain, John [R-AZ] · R–AZ
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
See H.R.1358.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Native American and Insular Affairs.
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.
Senate Committee on Indian Affairs discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S18250-18251)
Senate Committee on Indian Affairs discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S18250-18251)
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S17668-17669)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jun 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1431 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1431 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1431 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1431 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.