PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002

Returned to the Calendar. Calendar No. 214.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 14, 2001

Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 - Authorizes appropriations for FY 2002 for the conduct of intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the: (1) Central Intelligence Agency; (2) Department of Defense; (3) Defense Intelligence Agency; (4) National Security Agency; (5) Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force; (6) Departments of State, the Treasury, and Energy; (7) Federal Bureau of Investigation; (8) National Reconnaissance Office; and (9) National Imagery and Mapping Agency.Specifies that the amounts authorized and the authorized personnel ceilings as of September 30, 2002, for such activities are those specified in the classified Schedule of Authorizations.Allows the Director of Central Intelligence, with the approval of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, to authorize employment of civilian personnel in excess of the number authorized for FY 2002 (by not more than two percent) when necessary to the performance of important intelligence functions.Authorizes appropriations for the Community Management Account of the Director of Central Intelligence for FY 2002, as well as for full-time personnel for elements within such Account. Earmarks a specified amount of such funds for the National Drug Intelligence Center.Authorizes appropriations for FY 2002 for the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability Fund.Specifies that the authorization of appropriations by this Act shall not be deemed to constitute authority for the conduct of any intelligence activity which is not otherwise authorized by the Constitution or laws of the United States.Amends the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act to repeal a provision exempting the actions involving the identification and blocking of assets of significant foreign narcotics traffickers from judicial review.Requires the Attorney General to carry out a comprehensive review of current protections against the unauthorized disclosure of classified information.Amends the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 to require the President to make a certification to Congress (currently, only a determination) with respect to illicit drug trafficking before foreign agents may interdict, with immunity, an aircraft in that country's airspace.Extends through FY 2003 the Central Intelligence Agency Voluntary Separation Pay Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Graham, Bob [D-FL] · D–FL

Committees

  • Armed Services Committee
  • Intelligence (Select) Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Returned to the Calendar. Calendar No. 214.

    2. Senate passed companion measure H.R. 2883 in lieu of this measure by Yea-Nay Vote. 100 - 0. Record Vote Number: 332.

      Senate roll call 332 · Individual votes
    3. Senate incorporated this measure in H.R. 2883 as an amendment.

    4. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S11568-11583; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S11568-11570)

    5. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 214.

    6. Committee on Armed Services. Reported by Senator Levin with amendments. With written report No. 107-92.

    7. Committee on Armed Services. Reported by Senator Levin with amendments. With written report No. 107-92.

    8. Committee on Armed Services. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

    9. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services pursuant to Section 3(b) of S.Res. 400, 94th Congress for a period of not to exceed 30 days of session.

    10. Committee on Intelligence. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Graham. With written report No. 107-63.

    11. Committee on Intelligence. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Graham. With written report No. 107-63.

    12. Introduced in Senate

    13. Committee on Intelligence ordered to be reported an original measure.

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.1428 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.1428 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.1428 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.1428 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources