PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Plant Variety Protection Act Amendments of 1994

Became Public Law No: 103-349.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Aug 12, 1994

Plant Variety Protection Act Amendments of 1994 - Amends the Plant Variety Protection Act to revise definitions and establish rules of construction concerning: (1) the sale and disposition of harvesting material, varieties, and hybrid seeds; (2) the filing of applications for the protection or entering of a variety in an official register; and (3) the basis of determining the distinctness of a variety or whether a variety is publicly known. (Sec. 3) Entitles breeders of sexually reproduced or tuber propagated plant varieties other than fungi or bacteria (currently, other than fungi, bacteria, or first generation hybrids) who have reproduced a variety to plant variety protection if the variety is new, distinct, uniform, and stable. Provides that if two or more applicants for plant variety protection submit applications on the same filing date for indistinguishable varieties that fulfill the conditions for protection established by this Act, the applicant who first complies with this Act's requirements shall be entitled to protection to the exclusion of any other applicant. Issues a single protection certificate jointly to two or more applicants who comply with requirements on the same date for varieties that are indistinguishable. (Sec. 5) Grants an applicant two years (with appropriate additional time if rejected) to file necessary information under a foreign filing right of priority. (Sec. 7) Lengthens the term of plant variety protection from 18 to 20 years from the date of issuance of the protection certificate (25 years for trees or vines). (Sec. 8) Repeals priority contest and related adverse final judgment provisions. (Sec. 9) Adds the following activities to the list of actions which constitute infringement of an owner's right to plant variety protection if performed without an owner's authorization: (1) conditioning the variety for purposes of propagation; and (2) stocking the variety for any existing purpose which constitutes infringement. Permits owners to authorize the use of a variety subject to their own limitations. Provides that it shall not be an infringement of an owner's rights to perform any act: (1) concerning propagating material of a protected variety that has been marketed in the United States unless the act involves further propagation of the variety or involves an export into a country that does not protect such varieties of the plant genus or species (unless the export is for final consumption); or (2) done privately and for noncommercial purposes. (Sec. 10) Removes a provision that declares that it is not an infringement for a person whose primary farming occupation is the growing of crops for sale other than reproductive purposes to sell saved seed for reproductive purposes. (Sec. 12) Requires the use of a variety name in connection with a sale or advertising, except for certain turf and forage grass seeds (unless otherwise required by State law). (Sec. 13) Eliminates specified gender-based references.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Kerrey, J. Robert [D-NE] · D–NE

Committees

  • Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee
10 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 103-349.

  2. Became Public Law No: 103-349.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Senate agreed to the House amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S13090-13092)

  9. Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to the House amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S13090-13092)

  10. Message on House action received in Senate and at the desk: House amendment to Senate bill.

  11. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  12. A similar measure H.R. 2927 was laid on the table without objection.

  13. On passage Passed without objection.

  14. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.

  15. The House struck all after the enacting clause and inserted in lieu thereof the provisions of a similar measure H.R. 2927. Agreed to without objection.

  16. Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H8031-8034)

  17. Mr. de la Garza asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table and consider.

  18. Held at the desk.

  19. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  20. Received in the House.

  21. Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

  22. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

  23. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S6429-6432)

  24. Senate Committee on Agriculture discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  25. Senate Committee on Agriculture discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  26. Subcommittee on Agricultural Research. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 103-312.

  27. Referred to Subcommittee on Agricultural Research.

  28. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture.

  29. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S10867-10868, S10870-10872)

  30. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1406 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1406 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1406 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1406 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources