PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Irrigation Project Contract Extension Act of 1998

Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Aug 25, 1998

Irrigation Project Contract Extension Act of 1998 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior to extend through December 31, 2000, each of ten specified water service or repayment contracts for the Glendo Unit of the Missouri River Basin Project. Requires such contracts to be extended for the same term that the Cooperative Agreement for Platte River Research and other Efforts Relating to Endangered Species Habitats Along the Central Platte River, Nebraska, is extended, but not beyond December 31, 2001. Provides that the contracts shall be subject to renewal on the date that such Agreement terminates if it terminates before December 31, 2000.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Thomas, Craig [R-WY] · R–WY

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

  2. Held at the desk.

  3. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  4. Received in the House.

  5. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S11368, S11372)

  6. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S11368, S11372)

  7. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 525.

  8. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski under the authority of the order of Jul 31, 98 with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 105-288.

  9. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski under the authority of the order of Jul 31, 98 with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 105-288.

  10. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.

  11. Subcommittee on Water and Power. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 105-624.

  12. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior, and Office of Management and Budget.

  13. Referred to Subcommittee on Water and Power.

  14. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  15. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S11967)

  16. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1398 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1398 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1398 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1398 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources