PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

International Adoption Simplification Act

Became Public Law No: 111-287.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Nov 30, 2010

(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the Senate on July 21, 2010. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

International Adoption Simplification Act - Amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to include in the definition of "child," and thus in the exemption from required admissions vaccination documentation, certain children who have been adopted in a foreign country that is a signatory to the Convention on Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (Hague Convention) or who are emigrating from such a country for U.S. adoption.

Includes in such definition and exemption a child who is under the age of 18 at the time an immediate relative status petition is filed on his or her behalf, has been adopted abroad or is coming for U.S. adoption, and is the natural sibling of: (1) an adopted child from a Hague Convention signatory country; (2) a child adopted under the age of 16 who has lived with the adoptive parents for at least two years, or a child who has been abused; or (3) an orphan who was under the age of 16 at the time an immediate relative status petition was filed on his or her behalf.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

Makes such provisions effective on the date of enactment of this Act, except that such an alien sibling who has attained the age of 18 on or after April 1, 2008, shall be deemed to meet the age requirement if a petition for classification of the alien as an immediate relative is filed not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN] · D–MN

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
7 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 111-287.

  2. Became Public Law No: 111-287.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Cleared for White House.

  8. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  9. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H7406-7407)

  10. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H7406-7407)

  11. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 1376.

  12. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H7406-7408)

  13. Mr. Conyers moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  14. Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law.

  15. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  16. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  17. Received in the House.

  18. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  19. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  20. The committee substitute as amended agreed to by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6120)

  21. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S6120; text as reported in Senate: CR S6120)

  22. By Senator Leahy from Committee on the Judiciary filed written report. Report No. 111-220.

  23. By Senator Leahy from Committee on the Judiciary filed written report. Report No. 111-220.

  24. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 330.

  25. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Leahy with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  26. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Leahy with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  27. Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  28. Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

  29. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1376 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1376 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1376 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1376 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources