Gaylord Nelson Apostle Islands Stewardship Act of 2000
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Oct 5, 2000
Gaylord Nelson Apostle Islands Stewardship Act of 2000 - Requires the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the National Park Service, to: (1) evaluate areas of land within the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore in Wisconsin for inclusion in the National Wilderness System; (2) take appropriate action to protect the lighthouse structures at Raspberry Lighthouse and Outer Island Lighthouse on the Lakeshore. Authorizes appropriations.
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9975-9976, S9979-9980; text: CR S9979-9980)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9975-9976, S9979-9980; text: CR S9979-9980)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 749.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski under authority of the order of the Senate of 07/26/2000 with an amendment. With written report No. 106-371. (text of measure as reported in Senate: CR 10/5/2000 S9979)
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski under authority of the order of the Senate of 07/26/2000 with an amendment. With written report No. 106-371.(text of measure as reported in Senate: CR 10/5/2000 S9979)
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks, Historic Preservation, and Recreation. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 106-804.
Referred to Subcommittee on Parks, Preservation and Recreation.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text of measure as introduced: CR S562-563)
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S561-562)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.134 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.134 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.134 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.134 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.