PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to give the city of Mesquite, Nevada, the right to purchase at fair market value certain parcels of public land in the city.

Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jul 1, 1999

Grants the City of Mesquite, Nevada, the exclusive right, for 12 years, to purchase specified parcels of public land in Mount Diablo Meridian. Requires the proceeds of the sale of each parcel to be deposited into, and disposed of by the Secretary of the Interior from, the special account established under the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998. Directs the Secretary to convey to the city specified public lands to be selected by the city from among other specified parcels in Mount Diablo Meridian. Withdraws all such parcels from entry and appropriation under the public land laws and from operation of the mineral and geothermal leasing laws for 12 years.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Reid, Harry [D-NV] · D–NV

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.

    2. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    3. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    4. Held at the desk.

    5. Received in the House.

    6. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S15163)

    7. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S15163)

    8. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 246.

    9. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 106-134.

    10. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 106-134.

    11. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

    12. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior, OMB.

    13. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Forests and Public Land Management . Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 106-256.

    14. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    15. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S8128)

    16. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.1330 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.1330 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.1330 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.1330 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources