PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain land to Nye County, Nevada, and for other purposes.

Executive Comment Requested from Interior.

Official summary

Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Nov 19, 1999

Directs the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management, to convey specified parcels of public land to Nye County, Nevada, for the construction and operation of the Nevada Science and Technology Center as a nonprofit museum and exposition center.Grants the County the exclusive right to purchase other specified parcels of public land for their fair market value for five years, with the proceeds to be deposited into and made available to the Secretary from the special account established under the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Reid, Harry [D-NV] · D–NV

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Executive Comment Requested from Interior.

    2. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.

    3. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    4. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    5. Held at the desk.

    6. Received in the House.

    7. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S15163)

    8. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S15163)

    9. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 245.

    10. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with an amendment. With written report No. 106-133.

    11. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with an amendment. With written report No. 106-133.

    12. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior, OMB.

    13. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.

    14. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Forests and Public Land Management. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 106-256.

    15. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    16. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S8127)

    17. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.1329 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.1329 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.1329 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.1329 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources