PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Quinault Permanent Fisheries Fund Act

Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

Official summary

Version 80 · Reported to Senate without amendment · Sep 3, 2002

Quinault Permanent Fisheries Fund Act - Requires the judgment funds awarded on September 19, 1989, to the Quinault Indian Nation under specified U.S. Claims Court dockets to be disbursed by the Secretary of the Interior and deposited into the following three separate accounts to be established and maintained by the Tribe: (1) an account for the investment income earned on the funds from such date to the date of disbursement to be available for tribal government activities; (2) an account for the principal amount of the funds to be used to create a Permanent Fisheries Fund; and (3) an account for the investment income earned on such Fund to be available for fisheries enhancement projects and the costs associated with administering such Fund.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA] · D–WA

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
  • Indian Affairs Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

  2. Received in the House.

  3. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  4. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8862; text as passed Senate: CR S8862)

  5. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S8862; text as passed Senate: CR S8862)

  6. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 562.

  7. Committee on Indian Affairs. Reported by Senator Inouye without amendment. With written report No. 107-252.

  8. Committee on Indian Affairs. Reported by Senator Inouye without amendment. With written report No. 107-252.

  9. Committee on Indian Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  10. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.

  11. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 19, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1308 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1308 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1308 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1308 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources