PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to make technical corrections in title 17, United States Code, and other laws.

Became Public Law No: 106-44.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Jul 1, 1999

Makes technical amendments to Federal copyright law. Revises the denial of copyright protection for a design embodied in a useful article made public by the designer or owner in the United States or a foreign country more than a certain period of time before the date of the application for copyright registration, to increase from one year to two years such period of time before registration application and consequent copyright denial.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Hatch, Orrin G. [R-UT] · R–UT

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 106-44.

  2. Became Public Law No: 106-44.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H6362)

  9. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H6362)

  10. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 1260.

  11. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6362-6363)

  12. Mr. Coble moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  13. Held at the desk.

  14. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  15. Received in the House.

  16. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8192; text: CR S8192)

  17. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S8192; text: CR S8192)

  18. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 196.

  19. Committee on Judiciary. Reported to Senate by Senator Hatch with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  20. Committee on Judiciary. Reported to Senate by Senator Hatch with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  21. Committee on Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  22. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

  23. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S7452-7455)

  24. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1260 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1260 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1260 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1260 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources