PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Criminal Gang Abatement Act of 2001

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S8210-8212)

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jul 25, 2001

Criminal Gang Abatement Act of 2001 - Amends the Federal criminal code to prohibit solicitation or recruitment of persons for criminal street gang activity. Sets penalties for the use of minors in crimes of violence. Increases penalties for using minors to distribute drugs.Rewrites code provisions regarding criminal street gangs to: (1) define that term to mean a group of three (currently, five) or more persons; (2) list various predicate offenses, including a felony crime of violence; (3) direct that whoever during the commission of such a predicate offense meets specified criteria be imprisoned for up to ten years greater than the maximum term provided by statute for the most serious offenses; and (4) provide for forfeiture of property derived from the offense.Amends code provisions regarding interstate and foreign travel or transportation in aid of racketeering enterprises to include travel or transportation in aid of criminal gangs. Increases penalties for violations. Prohibits travel with intent to delay or influence the testimony of, or prevent from testifying, a witness in a State criminal proceeding.Increases penalties, and the scope of provisions, regarding the use of physical force to tamper with witnesses, victims, or informants.Directs the U.S. Sentencing Commission to increase the offense level for participation in crime as a gang member. Authorizes the Attorney General to designate high intensity interstate gang activity areas. Authorizes the use of certain grants to prosecutors' offices to combat gang crime and youth violence.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Feinstein, Dianne [D-CA] · D–CA

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
2 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S8210-8212)

  2. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S8207-8210, S8212-8213)

  3. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1236 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1236 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1236 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1236 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources