A bill to protect the elderly against fraudulent practices, and for other purposes.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jul 14, 1993
Directs the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to participate in, and receive products from, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Center of the Department of the Treasury. Amends the Federal Trade Commission Act to allow the FTC to bring criminal contempt actions for violations of court orders in the same manner as civil penalties and other Federal court actions. Directs the United States Sentencing Commission to amend its sentencing guidelines relating to: (1) fraud and deceit to provide for increases in offense levels based on the number of persons that the offender has victimized; and (2) vulnerable victims to provide for increased offense levels based on vulnerability. Amends the Federal sentencing statute to mandate restitution for victims (currently, such authority is discretionary). Expresses the sense of the Congress concerning its support of the National Telemarketing Fraud Working Group. Requires the Attorney General to designate additional existing full-time attorneys and support staff for consumer and anti-fraud activities. Amends civil and criminal forfeiture law to allow for the forfeiture of profits arising from mail, wire, and credit card violations in connection with fraud schemes against the elderly. Allows the use of a percentage of the amounts forfeited to provide restitution to victims. Includes credit card fraud in the money laundering statute. Directs the Attorney General to prepare model State law on the licensing of home repair contractors, mortgage companies, and prize giveaway companies. Includes the use of private courier services in the mail fraud statute.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.1217 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.1217 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.1217 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.1217 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.