PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S9990)
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 18, 1997
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Senate Election Spending Limits and Benefits Title II: Reduction of Special Interest Influence Subtitle A: Provisions Relating to Soft Money of Political Party Committees Subtitle B: Soft Money of Persons Other Than Political Parties Subtitle C: Contributions Subtitle D: Independent Expenditures Title III: Appropriations Title IV: Severability; Judicial Review; Effective Date; Regulations Senate Campaign Finance Reform Act of 1997 - Title I: Senate Election Spending Limits and Benefits - Amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA) to set forth Senate election spending limits and benefits. Directs the Federal Election Commission to certify a candidate who has met the requirements of this title as eligible for matching funds (under such title). Title II: Reduction of Special Interest Influence - Subtitle A: Provisions Relating to Soft Money of Political Party Committees - Prohibits a national committee of a political party (including specified related entities) from soliciting or receiving contributions or making expenditures not subject to FECA. Requires a State, district, or local committee of a political party (including specified related entities) to make Federal election year expenditures (with exceptions) from funds subject to FECA. Prohibits a national, State, district, or local committee from soliciting or donating funds to a tax-exempt organization. Prohibits an incumbent or candidate for Federal office from soliciting or receiving funds not subject to such Act, or to solicit or receive funds for a non-Federal election in excess of certain limits or from prohibited sources (with exceptions for State or local candidates in compliance with State law). (Sec. 202) Establishes aggregate and separate individual and multicandidate political committee contribution limits to State Party Grassroots Funds and all committees established by a State committee of a political party. Increases annual individual contribution limits. Sets forth State Party Grassroots Fund and reporting provisions. (Sec. 203) Prohibits applying the exclusion for building funds (relating to the definition of "contribution") for purposes of any requirement to report contributions under FECA, and requires all such contributions aggregating in excess of $200 to be reported. Authorizes the filing of State reports by State committees. Requires the reporting of all disbursements made by authorized committees. Revises requirements for the reporting of the names and addresses of persons to whom certain expenditures are made to meet candidate or committee operating expenses, to require the reporting of the election to which the operating expenditure relates. Subtitle B: Soft Money of Persons Other Than Political Parties - Requires certain persons other than a political party that make aggregate election activity disbursements exceeding $10,000 to file with the Commission. Subtitle C: Contributions - Revises the provision regarding contributions by foreign nationals to prohibit donations of money or any other thing of value to political parties by foreign nationals. (Sec. 222) Revises the limitation on annual individual contributions to prohibit an individual from making contributions to a candidate or donations to political committees aggregating more than $25,000 in a calendar year. (Sec. 223) Prohibits the making of contributions to certain officials to defray legal expenses of such officials under specified conditions. Subtitle D: Independent Expenditures - Redefines the term "independent expenditure." (Sec. 232) Repeals current independent expenditure reporting requirements and replaces them with new independent expenditure reporting requirements. Title III: Appropriations - Authorizes appropriations of such sums as may be necessary for: (1) FECA; (2) the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act; and (3) the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account. Title IV: Severability; Judicial Review; Effective Date; Regulations - Sets forth provisions regarding severability, expedited review of constitutional issues, effective date, and Commission regulations.
People & committees
Sen. Specter, Arlen [R-PA] · R–PA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S9990)
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S9637-9640)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1191 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1191 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1191 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1191 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.