PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Domestic and International Monetary Policy.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Aug 10, 1995
Defense Production Act Amendments of 1995 - Amends the Defense Production Act of 1950 to: (1) extend provisions of titles I, III, and VII of such Act through FY 1998 (with exceptions); and (2) extend through FY 1998 the authorization of appropriations for certain projects and activities contained under title III of such Act.
People & committees
Sen. D'Amato, Alfonse [R-NY] · R–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Domestic and International Monetary Policy.
Referred to the House Committee on Banking and Financial Services.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Received in the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S14570)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S14570)
Star Print ordered on S.Rept. 104-134.
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 178.
Committee on Banking. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator D'Amato. With written report No. 104-134.
Committee on Banking. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator D'Amato. With written report No. 104-134.
Introduced in Senate
Committee on Banking ordered to be reported an original measure.
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1147 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1147 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1147 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1147 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.