PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 426.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · May 25, 1999
Small Mine Advocacy Review Panel Act - Amends the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 to treat small mine operators as small entities for purposes of certain data gathering procedures.
People & committees
Sen. Enzi, Michael B. [R-WY] · R–WY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 426.
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Reported to Senate by Senator Jeffords under the authority of the order of 11/19/1999 without amendment. With written report No. 106-227. Additional and Minority views filed.
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Reported to Senate by Senator Jeffords under the authority of the order of 11/19/1999 without amendment. With written report No. 106-227. Additional and Minority views filed.
Committee on HELP. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on HELP.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S5955-5956)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1114 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1114 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1114 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1114 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.