PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jun 25, 2001
Veterans' Educational Assistance Restoration Act of 2001 - Makes eligible for educational assistance benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill an individual who: (1) was not on active duty on October 19, 1984; (2) reenlists or reenters into active duty after such date; and (3) after July 2, 1985, either serves at least three years of continuous active duty or is discharged or released for a service-connected disability, preexisting medical condition, hardship, or a physical or mental condition for the convenience of the Government, as long as such individual completed not less than 30 months of continuous active duty on that date; or (4) is involuntarily released at the convenience of the Government due to a reduction in force. Makes eligible for such assistance a member of the Selected Reserve who: (1) was not on active duty on October 19, 1984, (2) reenlists or reenters active duty after such date; and (3) after July 2, 1985, serves at least two years of continuous active duty and at least four continuous years in the Selected Reserve during which the individual participates satisfactorily in required training.
People & committees
Sen. Thompson, Fred [R-TN] · R–TN
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 19, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1095 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1095 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1095 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1095 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.