Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2001

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jun 21, 2001

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2001 - Makes supplemental appropriations (with some offsetting rescissions) for FY 2001 for: (1) the Department of Justice for the Radiation Exposure Compensation Trust Fund; (2) the Department of Defense (DOD) for military personnel, operation and maintenance (including funds for repair of the U.S.S. COLE), procurement, research, development, test and evaluation, Defense Working Capital Funds, and the Defense Health Program; (3) the Department of Energy (DOE) for certain defense-related activities; (4) DOD for military construction, family housing, and base realignment and closure; (5) the Department of Agriculture (DOA) for the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; (6) the Department of Commerce; (7) the Small Business Administration; (8) the District of Columbia for various programs and authorities; (9) DOD for certain activities of the Army Corps of Engineers; (10) DOE for certain energy programs; (11) the Agency for International Development for the Child Survival and Disease Programs Fund; (12) the Department of the Interior for the National Park Service and the Bureau of Indian Affairs for Indian programs; (13) DOA for the Forest Service; (14) the Department of Labor for the Employment and Training Administration; (15) the Department of Health and Human Services for health resources and services, substance abuse and mental health services, and low income home energy assistance; (16) the Department of Education for education for the disadvantaged and for educational research, statistics, and improvement; (17) the Office of Compliance; (18) the Government Printing Office; (19) the Department of Transportation for the Coast Guard; (20) the Department of the Treasury for operational and perimeter security at the 2002 Winter Olympics, the Financial Management Service, and the Internal Revenue Service; (21) the Department of Veterans Affairs for the Veterans Benefits Administration; (22) the Department of Housing and Urban Development for community planning and development; and (23) the United States-China Security Review Commission.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Sen. Byrd, Robert C. [D-WV] · D–WV

Committees

Appropriations Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Jul 10, 2001
See also H.R. 2216.
Jul 10, 2001
Returned to the Calendar. Calendar No. 76.
Jul 10, 2001
Senate passed companion measure H.R. 2216 in lieu of this measure by Yea-Nay Vote. 98 - 1. Record Vote Number: 228.
Senate roll call 228 · Individual votes
Jul 10, 2001
Senate incorporated this measure in H.R. 2216 as an amendment.
Jul 10, 2001
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S7363-7417)
Jul 9, 2001
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S7304-7310, S7312-7313, S7316-7324)
Jun 21, 2001
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 76.
Jun 21, 2001
Committee on Appropriations. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Byrd. With written report No. 107-33.
Jun 21, 2001
Committee on Appropriations. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Byrd. With written report No. 107-33.
Jun 21, 2001
Committee on Appropriations ordered to be reported an original measure.
Jun 21, 2001
Introduced in Senate

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Placed on Calendar Senate · Jun 21, 2001 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 2216 · Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2001

Source last updated: Mar 9, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1077 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.1077, 107th Congress: Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2001

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-bill/1077

Text version to examine: Placed on Calendar Senate · 2001-06-21.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/s1077/BILLS-107s1077pcs.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-03-09T19:33:04Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze S.1077 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1077 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.1077, 107th Congress: Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2001

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-bill/1077

Text version to examine: Placed on Calendar Senate · 2001-06-21.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/s1077/BILLS-107s1077pcs.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-03-09T19:33:04Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.1077 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1077 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.1077, 107th Congress: Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2001

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-bill/1077

Text version to examine: Placed on Calendar Senate · 2001-06-21.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/s1077/BILLS-107s1077pcs.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-03-09T19:33:04Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.1077 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1077 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.1077, 107th Congress: Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2001

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-bill/1077

Text version to examine: Placed on Calendar Senate · 2001-06-21.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/s1077/BILLS-107s1077pcs.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-03-09T19:33:04Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.1077 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.