PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Glacier Bay Management and Protection Act of 1997

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jul 24, 1997

Glacier Bay Management and Protection Act of 1997 - Amends the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into a contractual relationship with the Glacier Bay Lodge in Bartlett Cove, Alaska, for purposes of making improvements to the Lodge and related visitor facilities. Directs the Secretary, before entering into a cooperative agreement for alteration or expansion of National Park Service facilities in or near Gustavus, Alaska, to provide a report that includes a cost-benefit analysis of such activity to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and the House Committee on Resources (the Committees). Requires the Secretary to promulgate regulations to increase the number of Glacier Bay entry permits available to tour boats during June, July, and August to a level consistent with demand for entry. Directs the Secretary to submit a plan for conducting a survey of Glacier Bay National Park users to the Committees to determine the extent to which: (1) users consider the activities of other Park users as having an adverse impact on their enjoyment of the Park; and (2) user expectations for the Park are being satisfied. Provides for submission of survey results to the Committees as well as recommendations to reconcile competing Park uses or to satisfy visitor access needs. Allows subsistence fishing and gathering by local residents of the Park. Bars construction of permanent structures associated with such activities. Authorizes commercial fishing in the Park using specified methods in use during 1980-1996. Makes commercial fishing in the Park subject to Federal and State laws. Authorizes the Secretary to: (1) request the State fishery management authority to initiate remedial action if a significant adverse impact is occurring to a resident population of fish or shellfish as a result of such commercial fishing; and (2) promulgate regulations to protect threatened resources during an emergency where such fishing poses an immediate threat to a Park resource, including fish or shellfish. Designates the waters of Glacier Bay as the Glacier Bay Marine Fisheries Reserve. Requires the Reserve to remain open to fishing. Permits closures or restrictions on times, areas, methods, or means of access to the Reserve under certain conditions. Closes the waters of the Beardslee Islands managed as wilderness to commercial fishing, with specified income-related exceptions for Dungeness crab fishing. Establishes the Glacier Bay Fishery Science Advisory Council to: (1) report on the status of knowledge about fishery resources in the Park; (2) prepare a fisheries management plan for the Reserve; and (3) provide additional recommendations on fishery research and management priorities and needs in the Reserve, as appropriate.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Murkowski, Frank H. [R-AK] · R–AK

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  2. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S8093-8096)

  3. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1064 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1064 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1064 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1064 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources