A bill to require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to submit to Congress a report on certain hydropower projects.
By Senator Murkowski from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 115-310.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · May 3, 2017
This bill directs the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to submit to Congress a report on hydropower projects that:
identifies each project licensed by FERC that is located at a nonpowered site that serves as storage to support downstream power generation;
analyzes the value of electric power generation associated with each of these projects;
describes the range of options that exist under current law with respect to surrender or transfer of a FERC license for these projects;
identifies any barriers to the surrender or transfer of a FERC license for these projects; and
identifies the costs incurred by project owners resulting from the requirements imposed by a FERC license, including applicable costs broken down by category.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.1030 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.1030 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.1030 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.1030 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.