PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Hood Bay Land Exchange Act of 1997

By Senator Murkowski from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 105-90.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jul 14, 1997

Hood Bay Land Exchange Act of 1997 - Provides for: (1) the transfer of the reversionary interest of the United States in specified Federal land in Sitka, Alaska, to the Alaska Pulp Corporation in exchange for specified Corporation property located within the Admiralty Island National Monument; and (2) the Corporation's transfer of specified property to Sitka. Deems the values of the Federal Property and the Corporation Property to be unequal and conditions such exchange on the Corporation waiving any additional consideration not provided in this Act. Requires the Corporation property transferred to the United States: (1) to be added to and administered as part of the Monument; and (2) located within the Admiralty Island Wilderness area to be added to and administered as part of such area.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Murkowski, Frank H. [R-AK] · R–AK

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. By Senator Murkowski from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 105-90.

    2. By Senator Murkowski from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 105-90.

    3. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 176.

    4. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

    5. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

    6. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

    7. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 105-245.

    8. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    9. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S7423)

    10. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.1015 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.1015 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.1015 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.1015 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources