PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 3, 2019
Corporate Executive Accountability Act
This bill makes it unlawful for an executive officer of a corporation that generates more than $1 billion in annual revenue to negligently permit or fail to prevent violations of federal or state law.
Specifically, such an executive officer is criminally liable for actions in which the corporation was (1) convicted or entered into a deferred or non-prosecution agreement for any crime; (2) found liable or entered into a settlement with a state or federal agency for the violation of any civil law if such a violation affects the health, safety, finances, or personal data of a certain population; or (3) convicted or found liable for a different criminal or civil violation that was committed while the corporation was acting under a judgment, agreement, or settlement.
Additionally, the bill establishes penalties for violations. For a first offense, a violator is subject to a fine, a prison term of up to one year, or both. For a second or subsequent offense, a violator is subject to a fine, a prison term of up to three years, or both.
People & committees
Sen. Warren, Elizabeth [D-MA] · D–MA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1010 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1010 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1010 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1010 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.