PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Committee on Governmental Affairs. S. 1675 ordered reported as an original bill in lieu of this bill.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jan 21, 1993
Executive Organization Reform Act of 1993 - Establishes an independent National Commission on Executive Organization Reform to examine and make recommendations to the President and the Congress with respect to: (1) criteria for evaluating proposals to change the structure of the executive branch; (2) the organization and structure of the executive branch and its entities; (3) the organization and delivery of Government services; and (4) promoting economy, improving performance, and ensuring adequate capacity of executive entities to meet and manage their public missions. Sets forth procedures for consideration of Commission recommendations by the President and the Congress and their implementation by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. Authorizes appropriations.
People & committees
Sen. Glenn, John H., Jr. [D-OH] · D–OH
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. S. 1675 ordered reported as an original bill in lieu of this bill.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Hearings held.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S538)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.101 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.101 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.101 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.101 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.