PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Navajo-Hopi Land Settlement Amendments of 2005

Committee Hearings Held.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Dec 8, 2005

Navajo-Hopi Land Settlement Amendments of 2005 - Title I: Amendments to the Act of December 22, 1974 - (Sec. 101) Amends the Act of December 22, 1974 to repeal authority and requirements for appointment of Navajo and Hopi relocation negotiating teams, a Mediator, and related matters (because all such requirements have been fulfilled).

(Sec. 106) Revises requirements for the partition of the Navajo and Hopi Joint Use Area of the 1882 Reservation established by Executive Order on December 16, 1882.

(Sec. 107) Revises requirements for the exchange of land, at the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior, between the United States (under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management in Arizona and New Mexico) and the Navajo Tribe. (Currently, the Secretary is required to make such a land exchange.)

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

Terminates on September 30, 2008, the authority of the Commissioner of the Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (ONHIR) to select lands to be transferred to or acquired by the Navajo Tribe.

Authorizes the Commissioner, in order to facilitate relocation of a member of a Tribe, to grant a homesite lease on land acquired under such Act to a member of the extended family of a Navajo Indian eligible to receive benefits under such Act. Prohibits the Commissioner, however, from using any available funds to provide housing to such an extended family member.

(Sec. 108) Terminates ONHIR on September 30, 2008, and transfers all remaining duties to the Secretary.

Establishes in the Department of the Interior an Office of Relocation to replace ONHIR.

(Sec. 110) Prohibits any payment of benefits under the Act to any head of household not certified eligible to receive payments by September 30, 2005.

(Sec. 111) Directs the Commissioner to notify the Secretary by September 30, 2008, of any head of household who: (1) is certified eligible to receive benefits; (2) does not reside on land partitioned to the Tribe of which the head of household is a member; and (3) has not received a replacement home. Directs the Commissioner also, by September 30, 2008, to transfer to the Secretary any funds not used to make payments to eligible heads of households. Requires the Secretary to hold such funds in trust for the benefit of each eligible head of household who has not received a replacement home until he or she (or an heir) requests the funds for the acquisition of such a home.

Requires the Commissioner, within 180 days after enactment of this Act, to notify each eligible head of household who has not entered into a lease with the Hopi Tribe to reside on land partitioned to the Tribe. Authorizes the Commissioner to begin construction of a replacement home on acquired land within 90 days after receiving notice of the imminent removal of a relocatee from land provided to the Hopi Tribe.

Requires the Commissioner to establish an expedited procedure for reaching a final determination on appeals of eligibility denials. Authorizes appeal of an eligibility denial to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

(Sec. 121) Authorizes appropriations to carry out the relocation program for FY2006-FY2008.

Title II: Personnel of The Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation - (Sec. 201) Amends federal civil service law to provide that retention preference requirements shall not apply to an ONHIR employee.

(Sec. 202) Amends federal civil service law to direct the ONHIR Commissioner to establish a program to offer separation pay to ONHIR employees in the same manner as the Secretary of Defense offers separation pay to employees of a defense agency.

(Sec. 203) Modifies the retirement computation formula for ONHIR employees eligible for early or optional retirement.

Title III: Transfer of Functions And Savings Provisions - (Sec. 302) Transfers to the Secretary any ONHIR function that has not been carried out by ONHIR on the enactment of this Act.

(Sec. 303) Provides for the transfer and allocations of appropriations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. McCain, John [R-AZ] · R–AZ

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
  • Indian Affairs Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Committee Hearings Held.

    2. Executive Comment Requested from Interior.

    3. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    4. Held at the desk.

    5. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    6. Received in the House.

    7. Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (text of measure as passed Senate: CR S3924-3930)

    8. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.(text of measure as passed Senate: CR S3924-3930)

    9. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S3918-3930; text of measure as reported: CR S3918-3924)

    10. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 324.

    11. Committee on Indian Affairs. Reported by Senator McCain with amendments. With written report No. 109-206.

    12. Committee on Indian Affairs. Reported by Senator McCain with amendments. With written report No. 109-206.

    13. Committee on Indian Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

    14. Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 109-183.

    15. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs. (text of measure as introduced: CR S4950-4956)

    16. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4950)

    17. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Mar 9, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.1003 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.1003 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.1003 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.1003 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources