Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 2764) making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 72) making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and for other purposes.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Dec 19, 2007

Sets forth the rule for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to H.R. 2764 (making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for FY2008) and for consideration of H.J. Res. 72 (making further continuing appropriations for FY2008).

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-3] · D–MA

Committees

Rules Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Dec 19, 2007
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Dec 19, 2007
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H16887-16888)
Dec 19, 2007
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H16887-16888)
Dec 19, 2007
The previous question was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H16889)
Dec 19, 2007
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 893.
Dec 19, 2007
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H16887-16889)
Dec 19, 2007
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 175.
Dec 19, 2007
Provides for consideration of Senate amendment to House amendments to Senate amendment. (consideration: CR H16860-16863)
Dec 19, 2007
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 110-498, by Mr. McGovern.
Dec 19, 2007
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 110-498, by Mr. McGovern.
Dec 19, 2007
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Engrossed in House · Dec 19, 2007 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML
Reported in House · Dec 19, 2007 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.893 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.893, 110th Congress: Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 2764) making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 72) making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-resolution/893

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 2007-12-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/110/bills/hres893/BILLS-110hres893eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:34:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Res.893 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.893 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.893, 110th Congress: Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 2764) making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 72) making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-resolution/893

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 2007-12-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/110/bills/hres893/BILLS-110hres893eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:34:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.893 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.893 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.893, 110th Congress: Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 2764) making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 72) making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-resolution/893

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 2007-12-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/110/bills/hres893/BILLS-110hres893eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:34:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.893 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.893 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.893, 110th Congress: Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 2764) making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 72) making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-resolution/893

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 2007-12-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/110/bills/hres893/BILLS-110hres893eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:34:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.893 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.