PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.Res.863 / 118th Congress

Impeaching Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Received in the Senate.

Official summary

Version 53 · Passed House · Feb 13, 2024

This resolution impeaches Secretary of Homeland Security Mayorkas for high crimes and misdemeanors, including for his handling of issues involving fentanyl and border security.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Greene, Marjorie Taylor [R-GA-14] · R–GA

Committees

  • Homeland Security Committee
17 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate.

  2. On agreeing to the resolution, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 214 - 213 (Roll no. 43).

    House roll call 43 · Individual votes
  3. Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 214 - 213 (Roll no. 43).

    House roll call 43 · Individual votes
  4. On motion to reconsider Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 211 (Roll no. 42). (text: 2/6/2024 CR H449-451)

    House roll call 42 · Individual votes
  5. Mr. Moore (UT) moved to reconsider.

  6. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H572-573)

  7. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - The Chair put the question on the motion to reconsider the vote on H. Res. 863, as amended, and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Moore (UT) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

  8. Mr. Moore (UT) moved to reconsider.

  9. On agreeing to the resolution, as amended Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 214 - 216 (Roll no. 37).

    House roll call 37 · Individual votes
  10. Failed of passage/not agreed to in House On agreeing to the resolution, as amended Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 214 - 216 (Roll no. 37).

    House roll call 37 · Individual votes
  11. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H484)

  12. Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the House resumed consideration of H. Res. 863.

  13. The Chair announced that pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, further proceedings on H. Res. 863 are postponed.

  14. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H449-476)

  15. DEBATE - The House proceeded with two hours of debate on H. Res. 863.

  16. Rule provides for consideration of H. Res. 863 and H.R. 485. The resolution provides for consideration of H. Res. 863 under a closed rule and H.R. 485 under a structured rule. The rule provides for two hours of general debate on H. Res. 863 and one hour of general debate on H.R. 485. One motion to recommit allowed on H.R. 485. The resolution further provides that upon adoption H. Res. 863, H. Res. 995 is considered adopted; and further, that no other resolution incidental to impeachment relating to H. Res. 863 shall be privileged during the remainder of the 118th Congress.

  17. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 996.

  18. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 996 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H. Res. 863 and H.R. 485. The resolution provides for consideration of H. Res. 863 under a closed rule and H.R. 485 under a structured rule. The rule provides for two hours of general debate on H. Res. 863 and one hour of general debate on H.R. 485. One motion to recommit allowed on H.R. 485. The resolution further provides that upon adoption H. Res. 863, H. Res. 995 is considered adopted; and further, that no other resolution incidental to impeachment relating to H. Res. 863 shall be privileged during the remainder of the 118th Congress.

  19. Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 60.

  20. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 118-372.

  21. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 118-372.

  22. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 15.

  23. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  24. Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability Discharged

  25. Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement Discharged

  26. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  27. On motion to refer Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 209 - 201 (Roll No. 645).

    House roll call 645 · Individual votes
  28. The previous question on the motion to refer was ordered without objection.

  29. Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.

  30. Ms. Clark (MA) moved to refer to Homeland Security.

  31. Considered as privileged matter.

  32. Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.

  33. Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.

  34. Introduced in House

  35. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: May 27, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.863 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.863 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.863 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.863 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources