PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 7, 2001
Makes amounts available for expenses, including staff salaries, of the following committees of the House of Representatives in the 107th Congress: (1) Agriculture; (2) Armed Services; (3) Budget; (4) Education and the Workforce; (5) Energy and Commerce; (6) Financial Services; (7) Government Reform; (8) House Administration; (9) Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence; (10) International Relations; (11) Judiciary; (12) Resources; (13) Rules; (14) Science; (15) Small Business; (16) Standards of Official Conduct; (17) Transportation and Infrastructure; (18) Veterans' Affairs; and (19) Ways and Means.Sets forth first and second session limitations on such amounts.Grants the Committee on House Administration authority to make adjustments in such amounts if necessary to comply with a presidential sequestration order issued under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act) or to conform to any reduction in appropriations.
People & committees
Rep. Ney, Robert W. [R-OH-18] · R–OH
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 357 - 61 (Roll no. 62). (text: CR H1144)
House roll call 62 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 357 - 61 (Roll no. 62).(text: CR H1144)
House roll call 62 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1154-1155)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - The Chair put the question on adoption of the resolution, as amended, and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Subsequently, on the question of adoption, Mr. Hoyer demanded the Yeas and Nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until later in the legislative day.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 84.
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H1143-1148)
Mr. Ney asked unanimous consent to consider pursuant to a previous order of the House.
ORDER OF BUSINESS - Mr. Ney asked unanimous consent that it be in order at any time on the legislative day of March 27, 2001, without intervention of any point of order to consider H. Res. 84; that the resolution be considerd as read for amendment; that the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on House Administration now printed in the resolution be considered as adopted; and that the previous question be considered as ordered on the resolution, as amended, to adoption without intervening motion except one hour of debate equally divided and controlled. Agreed to without objection.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 10.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on House Administration. H. Rept. 107-25.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on House Administration. H. Rept. 107-25.
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.84 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.84 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.84 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.84 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.