PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.On motion to table the motion to reconsider Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 194 (Roll No. 1099).
Congressional Research Service
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Nov 14, 2007
Waives points of order against consideration of the conference report on H.R. 3074 (Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008).
People & committees
Rep. Arcuri, Michael A. [D-NY-24] · D–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
On motion to table the motion to reconsider Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 194 (Roll No. 1099).
House roll call 1099 · Individual votesMr. Arcuri moved to table the motion to reconsider.
Mr. Diaz-Balart, L. moved to reconsider adoption of the resolution.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 224 - 194 (Roll no. 1098). (text: CR H13885-13886)
House roll call 1098 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 224 - 194 (Roll no. 1098).(text: CR H13885-13886)
House roll call 1098 · Individual votesOn motion to table the motion to reconsider Agreed to by recorded vote: 221 - 196 (Roll No. 1097).
House roll call 1097 · Individual votesMr. Arcuri moved to table the motion to reconsider.
Mr. Diaz-Balart, L. moved to reconsider ordering the previous question.
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by recorded vote: 221 - 195 (Roll no. 1096). (consideration: CR H13892-13893)
House roll call 1096 · Individual votesDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 817.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H13885-13888, H13889-13891, H13891-13896)
On motion to consider the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 197 - 186 (Roll no. 1093).
House roll call 1093 · Individual votesPOINT OF ORDER - Mr. Flake raised a point of order against the provisions of H. Res. 817 because it waives all points of order against the conference report to accompany H.R. 3074 and against its consideration. The Chair announced that the disposition of the point of order would be resolved by the question of consideration of H. Res. 817. The House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the point of order at the end of which the Chair will put the question on consideration.
By direction of the Committee on Rules, Mr. Arcuri called up H.Res. 817, and asked for its immediate consideration.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 154.
All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration includes a waiver of clause 8 of rule XXII.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 110-447, by Mr. Arcuri.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 110-447, by Mr. Arcuri.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.817 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.817 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.817 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.817 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.