PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · May 17, 2006
Sets forth the rule for further consideration of H.Con.Res. 376 (establishing the congressional budget for the federal government for FY2007 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for FY2008-FY2011).
People & committees
Rep. Putnam, Adam H. [R-FL-12] · R–FL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 226 - 193 (Roll no. 154). (text: CR H2691-2692)
House roll call 154 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 226 - 193 (Roll no. 154).(text: CR H2691-2692)
House roll call 154 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 193 (Roll no. 153). (consideration: CR H2700-2702; text: CR H2700-2701)
House roll call 153 · Individual votesPOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - The Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of ordering the previous question on H. Res. 817 until later in the legislative day.
All time for debate having expired, Mr. Putnam moved the previous question on H. Res. 817.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 179.
The amendments printed in part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted in the House as in the Committee of the Whole.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 109-468, by Mr. Putnam.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 109-468, by Mr. Putnam.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 817.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2691-2702)
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.817 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.817 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.817 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.817 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.