Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1158) to authorize cyber incident response teams at the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1865) to require the Secretary of the Treasury to mint a coin in commemoration of the opening of the National Law Enforcement Museum in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes; and providing for the adoption of the resolution (H. Res. 761) permitting individuals to be admitted to the Hall of the House in order to obtain footage of the House in session for inclusion in the orientation film to be shown to visitors at the Capitol Visitor Center.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 53 · Passed House · Dec 17, 2019
This resolution sets forth the rule for consideration of the Senate amendment to (1) H.R. 1158 (DHS Cyber Hunt and Incident Response Teams Act of 2019), and (2) H.R. 1865 (National Law Enforcement Museum Commemorative Coin Act).
The chair of the Committee on Appropriations may insert in the Congressional Record by December 17, 2019, such material as the chair may deem explanatory of the Senate amendments and the motions specified in this resolution.
The resolution also adopts H.Res. 761 (permitting individuals to be admitted to the Hall of the House and connecting rooms to obtain footage of the House in session for inclusion in the orientation film to be shown to visitors at the Capitol Visitor Center).
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H10312-10314)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At conclusion of debate on H. Res. 765, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Cole demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 765.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H10309-10312)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 62.
Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendments to H.R. 1158, H.R. 1865; and for H. Res. 761. The Senate amendments will be debatable for one hour each. The previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions or demand for division of the question. Upon adoption of H. Res. 765, H. Res. 761 shall be considered as adopted.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 116-353, by Mr. Morelle.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 116-353, by Mr. Morelle.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.Res.765 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.Res.765 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.Res.765 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.Res.765 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.