PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Europe, Energy, the Environment and Cyber.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 2, 2021
This resolution lauds the strengthening of civil society, democracy, and democratic institutions in the Republic of Moldova and encourages the people and elected representatives in Moldova to continue to enhance their democracy, strengthen the rule of law, and fight corruption.
The resolution supports the Moldovan people's aspirations for deepening the relationship between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova and developing stronger connections to the transatlantic partners of the United States.
The resolution urges elected officials and policymakers in Moldova to build upon the practices of recent free and fair elections to further bolster legitimate and equitable election processes in their nation.
Finally, this resolution calls for all personnel and equipment belonging to Russian security or armed forces to withdraw from Moldova.
People & committees
Rep. Keating, William R. [D-MA-9] · D–MA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Europe, Energy, the Environment and Cyber.
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 23, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.763 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.763 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.763 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.763 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.