PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.Res.755 / 116th Congress

Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

The Senate adjudges that Donald John Trump, President of the United States, is not guilty as charged in the second Article of Impeachment by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 34.

Official summary

Version 53 · Passed House · Dec 18, 2019

This resolution impeaches President Donald J. Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors.

The resolution sets forth two articles of impeachment of the President: (1) abuse of power by soliciting the interference of Ukraine in the 2020 U.S. presidential election, and (2) obstruction of Congress by directing defiance of certain subpoenas issued by the House of Representatives.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Nadler, Jerrold [D-NY-10] · D–NY

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. The Senate adjudges that Donald John Trump, President of the United States, is not guilty as charged in the second Article of Impeachment by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 34.

      Senate roll call 34 · Individual votes
    2. The Senate adjudges that Donald John Trump, President of the United States, is not guilty as charged in the first Article of Impeachment by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 52. Record Vote Number: 33.

      Senate roll call 33 · Individual votes
    3. Received in the Senate.

    4. Motion to reconsider Article II laid on the table. Agreed to without objection.

    5. Motion to reconsider Article I laid on the table. Agreed to without objection.

    6. On agreeing to Article II of the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 229 - 198, 1 Present (Roll no. 696). (text: CR H12131)

      House roll call 696 · Individual votes
    7. Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to Article II of the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 229 - 198, 1 Present (Roll no. 696).(text: CR H12131)

      House roll call 696 · Individual votes
    8. On agreeing to Article I of the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 230 - 197, 1 Present (Roll no. 695). (text: CR H12130-12131)

      House roll call 695 · Individual votes
    9. Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to Article I of the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 230 - 197, 1 Present (Roll no. 695).(text: CR H12130-12131)

      House roll call 695 · Individual votes
    10. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

    11. DEBATE - The House proceeded with six hours of debate on H. Res. 755.

    12. Rule provides for consideration of H. Res. 755 with 6 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions. Bill is closed to amendments. The question of adoption of the resolution, as amended shall be divided between the two articles. The amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted After adoption of H. Res. 755, it shall be in order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House a resolution appointing and authorizing managers for the impeachment trial if offered by the chair of the Committee on the Judiciary or his designee.

    13. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 767. (consideration: CR H12130-12206)

    14. Rule H. Res. 767 passed House.

    15. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 767 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H. Res. 755 with 6 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions. Bill is closed to amendments. The question of adoption of the resolution, as amended shall be divided between the two articles. The amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted After adoption of H. Res. 755, it shall be in order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House a resolution appointing and authorizing managers for the impeachment trial if offered by the chair of the Committee on the Judiciary or his designee.

    16. Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 61.

    17. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 116-346.

    18. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 116-346.

    19. Ordered to be Reported (Amended).

    20. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    21. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    22. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    23. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    24. Introduced in House

    25. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.Res.755 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.Res.755 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.Res.755 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.Res.755 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources