Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 7) relating to a national emergency declared by the President on March 13, 2020; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 139) to require Executive agencies to submit to Congress a study of the impacts of expanded telework and remote work by agency employees during the COVID-19 pandemic and a plan for the agency's future use of telework and remote work, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 382) to terminate the public health emergency declared with respect to COVID-19; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 497) to eliminate the COVID-19 vaccine mandate on health care providers furnishing items and services under certain Federal health care programs.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 53 · Passed House · Jan 31, 2023
This resolution sets forth the rule for consideration of
H.J. Res. 7 (terminates the national emergency concerning COVID-19 declared by the President on March 13, 2020),
H.R. 139 (Stopping Home Office Work's Unproductive Problems Act of 2023 or the SHOW UP Act of 2023, which requires executive agencies to reinstate the telework policies that were in place on December 31, 2019, and restricts implementation of expanded telework policies),
H.R. 382 (Pandemic Is Over Act, which terminates the COVID-19 public health emergency that was declared on January 31, 2020), and
H.R. 497 (Freedom for Health Care Workers Act, which nullifies a rule issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services that requires health care providers, as a condition of Medicare and Medicaid participation, to ensure that staff are fully vaccinated against COVID-19).
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H530-531)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 75, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question on H. Res 75 and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 75.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H520-529)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 1.
All bills are considered under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-1, by Mr. Burgess.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-1, by Mr. Burgess.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: May 27, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.Res.75 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.Res.75 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.Res.75 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.Res.75 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.