PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 53 · Passed House · Oct 21, 2021
This resolution sets forth the rule for consideration of (1) H.Rept. 117-152 from the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, and (2) the accompanying resolution that finds Stephen K. Bannon in contempt of Congress for failing to comply with a congressional subpoena.
People & committees
Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2] · D–MA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 221 - 205 (Roll no. 328). (text: CR H5738)
House roll call 328 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 221 - 205 (Roll no. 328).(text: CR H5738)
House roll call 328 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 221 - 206 (Roll no. 327). (consideration: CR H5746)
House roll call 327 · Individual votesDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 727.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H5738-5748)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 40.
Provides that if House Report 117-152 is called up by direction of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol: (a) all points of order against the report are waived and the report shall be considered as read; and an accompanying resolution offered by the direction of the Select Committe shall be considered as read and shall not be subject to a point of order. The previous question shall be considered as orderered on such resolution to adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the question except one
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 117-153, by Mr. McGovern.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 117-153, by Mr. McGovern.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.727 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.727 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.727 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.727 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.