PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 53 · Passed House · Nov 20, 2019
This resolution sets forth the rule for consideration of H.R. 1309 (Workplace Violence Prevention for Health Care and Social Service Workers Act).
Certain proceedings may take place on any legislative day from November 22, 2019, through December 2, 2019.
It shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of November 21, 2019, for the Speaker of the House to suspend the rules.
People & committees
Rep. DeSaulnier, Mark [D-CA-11] · D–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 209 - 205 (Roll no. 633). (text: CR H9068-9069)
House roll call 633 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 209 - 205 (Roll no. 633).(text: CR H9068-9069)
House roll call 633 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 223 - 194 (Roll no. 632). (consideration: CR H9072, H9098)
House roll call 632 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H9098-9099)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the resolution, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and announced, by voice vote, that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Burgess demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 713.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H9068-9072)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 55.
Also provides for proceedings during the period from November 22, 2019 through December 2, 2019 and for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 116-302, by Mr. DeSaulnier.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 116-302, by Mr. DeSaulnier.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.713 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.713 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.713 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.713 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.