PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 4, 1993
Provides that upon the adoption of this resolution the Senate amendments to H.R. 1 (family and temporary medical leave) are agreed to by the House of Representatives.
People & committees
Rep. Gordon, Bart [D-TN-6] · D–TN
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 247 - 152 (Roll no. 29).
House roll call 29 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 247 - 152 (Roll no. 29).
House roll call 29 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 227 - 172 (Roll no. 28).
House roll call 28 · Individual votesDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 10.
Mr. Walker raised a point of order against the consideration of the measure. Mr. Walker stated that the self-enacting provision in the resolution, disposing of a Senate amendment to a House bill, is a violation of rule XX of the rules of the House which require the consideration of such amendments to be entertained in the Committee of the Whole. The Chair stated that the point of order was not well taken.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H557-569)
Rule provides for consideration of senate amedment to H.R. 1. Upon adoption of this resolution, the bill shall be taken from the Speaker's table to the end that the Senate amendment shall be agreed to.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-13, by Mr. Gordon.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-13, by Mr. Gordon.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.71 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.71 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.71 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.71 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.