Expressing support for designation of the week of November 3 through 9, 2019, as National Family Service Learning Week.

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.

H.Res.669 through Congress

H.Res.669 is considered only in the House.

HouseOct 31, 2019IntroducedOfficial record

Major milestones in the imported record. See all actions.

Separate related Senate measures (2)

These are different measures identified as related by Congress.gov. Their text and outcomes may differ; they are not the Senate stage of H.Res.669.

Related Senate measure: S.Res.412 A resolution expressing support for the designation of the week of November 4 through November 8, 2019, as "National Family Service Learning Week".

Related Senate measure: S.Res.739 A resolution expressing support for the designation of the week of September 21 through September 25, 2020, as "National Family Service Learning Week".

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 31, 2019

This resolution (1) expresses support for the designation of National Family Service Learning Week, (2) recognizes the importance of family service learning in cultivating civic engagement and community investment, and (3) encourages the public to support family service learning and community development programs. Family service learning is a multigenerational problem-solving approach that utilizes active participation to meet community needs and develop the skillsets of children and families.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Yarmuth, John A. [D-KY-3] · D–KY

Committees

Education and Workforce Committee

3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Oct 31, 2019
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
Oct 31, 2019
Introduced in House
Oct 31, 2019
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Oct 31, 2019 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.669 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.669, 116th Congress: Expressing support for designation of the week of November 3 through 9, 2019, as National Family Service Learning Week.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/669

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2019-10-31.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hres669/BILLS-116hres669ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-05T15:59:28Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Res.669 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.669 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.669, 116th Congress: Expressing support for designation of the week of November 3 through 9, 2019, as National Family Service Learning Week.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/669

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2019-10-31.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hres669/BILLS-116hres669ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-05T15:59:28Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.669 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.669 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.669, 116th Congress: Expressing support for designation of the week of November 3 through 9, 2019, as National Family Service Learning Week.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/669

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2019-10-31.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hres669/BILLS-116hres669ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-05T15:59:28Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.669 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.669 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.669, 116th Congress: Expressing support for designation of the week of November 3 through 9, 2019, as National Family Service Learning Week.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/669

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2019-10-31.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hres669/BILLS-116hres669ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-05T15:59:28Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.669 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.