PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Jun 9, 2004
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Expresses the House of Representatives deepest appreciation for the profound public service of President Ronald Reagan and its condolences to his wife, Nancy, and to his surviving children, Patti, Michael, and Ron, and the entire Reagan family.
Calls on the people of the United States to reflect on President Reagan's record as President of the United States during this national period of remembrance.
People & committees
Rep. Lewis, Jerry [R-CA-41] · R–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 375 - 0 (Roll no. 231). (text: CR 6/8/2004 H3794)
House roll call 231 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 375 - 0 (Roll no. 231).(text: CR 6/8/2004 H3794)
House roll call 231 · Individual votesThe previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the order of Tuesday, June 8, 2004, the House proceeded with the remaining 3 hours of debate on H. Res. 664.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3829-3869)
EXTENSION OF DEBATE TIME - Pursuant to the order of the House of today and as the designee of the Majority Leader, Mr. Lewis of California requested an additional hour of debate to be equally divided and controlled on H. Res. 664.
EXTENSION OF DEBATE TIME - Pursuant to the order of the House of today and as the designee of the Majority Leader, Mr. Lewis of California requested an additional hour of debate to be equally divided and controlled on H. Res. 664.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with two hours of debate on H. Res. 664 with additional time to be granted pursuant to a previous order of the House.
Considered by previous special order. (consideration: CR H3793, H3794-3818)
Consideration initiated by previous special order.
Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.664 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.664 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.664 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.664 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.