PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Sep 19, 2007
Sets forth the rule for consideration of H.R. 2761 (Terrorism Risk Insurance Revision and Extension Act of 2007).
People & committees
Rep. Arcuri, Michael A. [D-NY-24] · D–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 223 - 195 (Roll no. 880). (text: CR H10516-10517)
House roll call 880 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 223 - 195 (Roll no. 880).(text: CR H10516-10517)
House roll call 880 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 197 (Roll no. 879). (consideration: CR H10523-10524, H10524-10525)
House roll call 879 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H10525-10526)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 660, Mr. Arcuri moved the previous question and by voice vote, the Chair announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Arcuri demanded the Yeas and Nays which were ordered, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of ordering the previous question until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 660.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H10516-10524)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 117.
All points of order against consideration of the bill except clauses 9 and 10 of Rules XXI. The rule provides that the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Financial Services now printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in Part A of this report, shall be considered as adopted. The rule makes in order only those further amendments printed in Part B of this report.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 110-333, by Mr. Arcuri.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 110-333, by Mr. Arcuri.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.660 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.660 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.660 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.660 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.