Requesting the President and directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution documents in the possession of those officials relating to the authorization of electronic surveillance of citizens of the United States without court approved warrants.

Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 150.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 79 · Reported to House without amendment · Mar 2, 2006

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Directs the President and the Attorney General to transmit to the House of Representatives within 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution: (1) all documents in their possession relating to the authorization of electronic surveillance of U.S. persons conducted without warrants approved by a U.S. court; and (2) any instructions for handling such documents.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [D-NY-28] · D–NY

Committees

Judiciary Committee

1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Rep. Holt, Rush [D-NJ-12]

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Mar 2, 2006
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 150.
Mar 2, 2006
Reported adversely by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 109-383.
Mar 2, 2006
Reported adversely by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 109-383.
Feb 15, 2006
Ordered to be Reported Adversely by Voice Vote.
Feb 15, 2006
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Dec 22, 2005
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Dec 22, 2005
Introduced in House
Dec 22, 2005
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Reported in House · Mar 2, 2006 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML
Introduced in House · Dec 22, 2005 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.644 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.644, 109th Congress: Requesting the President and directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution documents in the possession of those officials relating to the authorization of electronic surveillance of citizens of the United States without court approved warrants.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-resolution/644

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2006-03-02.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/109/bills/hres644/BILLS-109hres644rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:33:00Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Res.644 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.644 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.644, 109th Congress: Requesting the President and directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution documents in the possession of those officials relating to the authorization of electronic surveillance of citizens of the United States without court approved warrants.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-resolution/644

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2006-03-02.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/109/bills/hres644/BILLS-109hres644rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:33:00Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.644 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.644 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.644, 109th Congress: Requesting the President and directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution documents in the possession of those officials relating to the authorization of electronic surveillance of citizens of the United States without court approved warrants.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-resolution/644

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2006-03-02.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/109/bills/hres644/BILLS-109hres644rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:33:00Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.644 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.644 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.644, 109th Congress: Requesting the President and directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution documents in the possession of those officials relating to the authorization of electronic surveillance of citizens of the United States without court approved warrants.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-resolution/644

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2006-03-02.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/109/bills/hres644/BILLS-109hres644rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:33:00Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.644 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.