Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 4386) to amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide medical assistance for certain women screened and found to have breast or cervical cancer under a federally funded screening program, to amend the Public Health Service Act and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to surveillance and information concerning the relationship between cervical cancer and the human papillomavirus (HPV), and for other purposes.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 11, 2000

Sets forth the rule for the consideration of the Senate amendment to H.R. 4386 (medical assistance relating to breast and cervical cancer).

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Myrick, Sue Wilkins [R-NC-9] · R–NC

Committees

Rules Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Oct 12, 2000
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Oct 12, 2000
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.
Oct 12, 2000
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.
Oct 12, 2000
The previous question on both the amendment and on the resolution was ordered.
Oct 12, 2000
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 628.
Oct 12, 2000
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H9843-9847; text of measure as reported in House: CR H9843)
Oct 11, 2000
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 309.
Oct 11, 2000
Rule provides for consideration of Sen. amendment with amemdment to H.R. 4386 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions.
Oct 11, 2000
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 106-975, by Mrs. Myrick.
Oct 11, 2000
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 106-975, by Mrs. Myrick.
Oct 11, 2000
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Engrossed in House · Oct 12, 2000 Formatted Text PDF
Reported in House · Oct 11, 2000 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 4386 · Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.628 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.628, 106th Congress: Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 4386) to amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide medical assistance for certain women screened and found to have breast or cervical cancer under a federally funded screening program, to amend the Public Health Service Act and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to surveillance and information concerning the relationship between cervical cancer and the human papillomavirus (HPV), and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-resolution/628

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 2000-10-12.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/106/bills/hres628/BILLS-106hres628eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:47:21Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Res.628 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.628 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.628, 106th Congress: Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 4386) to amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide medical assistance for certain women screened and found to have breast or cervical cancer under a federally funded screening program, to amend the Public Health Service Act and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to surveillance and information concerning the relationship between cervical cancer and the human papillomavirus (HPV), and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-resolution/628

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 2000-10-12.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/106/bills/hres628/BILLS-106hres628eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:47:21Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.628 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.628 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.628, 106th Congress: Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 4386) to amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide medical assistance for certain women screened and found to have breast or cervical cancer under a federally funded screening program, to amend the Public Health Service Act and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to surveillance and information concerning the relationship between cervical cancer and the human papillomavirus (HPV), and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-resolution/628

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 2000-10-12.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/106/bills/hres628/BILLS-106hres628eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:47:21Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.628 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.628 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.628, 106th Congress: Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 4386) to amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide medical assistance for certain women screened and found to have breast or cervical cancer under a federally funded screening program, to amend the Public Health Service Act and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to surveillance and information concerning the relationship between cervical cancer and the human papillomavirus (HPV), and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-resolution/628

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 2000-10-12.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/106/bills/hres628/BILLS-106hres628eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:47:21Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.628 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.